ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Knotless Suture in Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty
Barbed suture has been demonstrated to be safe in primary hip and knee surgery and retrospective data suggests barbed suture represents no increased complications in the revision setting. Barbed suture may represent a faster, more effective way to perform revision arthroplasty closures. There are no Level I studies comparing traditional and barbed suture closure. The purpose of this study is to assess the surgical complexities of closures using closure time without sacrificing cosmesis or wound complications between the traditional closure and barbed closure.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Hip DAA Closure Techniques#1101951
- Influence of Suture Type on Emergency Midline Laparotomy Closure#1170492
- Evaluating the Effect of Surgical Drain Securement on Patient Quality of Life and Postoperative Drain-related Complications#884137
- When salvage becomes suffering: re-evaluating the limits of limb preservation in modern orthoplastic surgery.#685920
- A Prospective Comparison of Suture Removal Time for Simple Surgical Defects of the Head and Neck#870476
Record · ID 828307
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive