ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
FANS VS DISS in Treatment of Renal Stone < 2cm
To compare between FANS \& DISS in : * Operative time * Stone free rate * Complications * Amount of fluid irrigation
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones With a Diameter≤2cm by Intelligent Pressure-controlled Flexible Ureteroscope#1095642
- Suction Mini-PCNL Versus Standard PCNL for the Management of 2-4cm Kidney Stones#840860
- Steerable vs Conventional FANS for <2cm Lower Pole Stone Treatment: SCULPT Trial#878534
- Comparison of ESWL and Mini-PCNL for High-Density Renal Stones in Children#841361
- SMP vs RIRS for Symptomatic Lower Pole Renal Calculi of 10-20 mm Size: a Randomized Controlled Trial#903364
Record · ID 828811
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive