PhilArchive
open access
Understanding Moral Responsibility in Automated Decision-Making: Responsibility Gaps and Strategies to Address Them
This paper delves into the use of machine learning-based systems in decision-making processes and its implications for moral responsibility as traditionally defined. It focuses on the emergence of responsibility gaps and examines proposed strategies to address them. The paper aims to provide an introductory and comprehensive overview of the ongoing debate surrounding moral responsibility in automated decision-making. By thoroughly examining these issues, we seek to contribute to a deeper understanding of the implications of AI integration in society.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Decisional Value Scores#119505
- Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Human Autonomy: an analysis of free will and moral responsibility in data-driven decision-making#692333
- Independ Researcher#71401
- Fairness Is Not Innate: A Three-Variable Framework for Human and Artificial Moral Behavior#223372
- Ethical assessments and mitigation strategies for biases in AI-systems used during the COVID-19 pandemic#97161
Record · ID 83058
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive