ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Laparoscopy-assisted Proximal Gastrectomy Versus and Laparoscopy-assisted Total Gastrectomy
The choice of surgical strategy for patients with proximal gastric cancer is controversial mainly because proximal gastrectomy is infamous for high rates of reflux symptoms and anastomotic stricture. but there are no prospective randomized trials until now. The primary end point of this study is whether the rate of reflux esophagitis is different or not between LAPG and LATG. Through this study, we
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- EPASS Versus Uncovered Duodenal Stent for Unresectable Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction.#854479
- Prophylactic Pancreatic Duct Stent Placement After ESP of Major Papillary Tumors; Prospective, Randomized Study#839955
- Comparison of Double-tract and Tubular Gastric Anastomosis in Proximal Gastric Cancer#896383
- Application of a New Surgical Technique in Proximal Gastrectomy: a Prospective, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study#1047167
- Innovations in Gastric Cancer Surgery During Early Minimally Invasive Era and Future Perspectives.#399641
Record · ID 832188
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive