ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Goal Directed Haemodynamic Treatment for Patients With Proximal Femoral Fracture
The investigators aimed to compare the costs and consequences of 'routine perioperative fluid therapy' and 'GDHT in terms of morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, activity of daily living, health related quality of life, cognitive functions and need of social services and up till 12 months following operations of proximal femoral fracture at elderly. The primary hypothesis is that 'GDHT is a better strategy than 'routine fluid therapy' in terms of reduced frequency of postoperative complications.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison Between LISS Plating and Intramedullary (IM) Nailing for Supracondylar Femur Fractures#903018
- Clinical Observation Study of the Hydroxylapatite-coated SL-PLUS™ Hip Shaft#1112971
- pDIFFIR: Geriatric Periprosthetic DIstal Femur: FIxation Versus Replacement#1087213
- Combined Tranexamic Acid Use in Total Hip Replacement Surgery#876115
- Strategy for Aortic Surgery Hemostasis#832054
Record · ID 832418
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive