ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
NAVA vs. CMV Crossover in Severe BPD
This prospective, unblinded, pilot randomized cross-over trial of 2 modes of mechanical ventilation will compare measures of pulmonary mechanics, respiratory gas exchange, and patient comfort between conventional flow triggered mechanical ventilation and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) among 20 prematurely born infants and young children receiving invasive respiratory support for severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Incidence and Evolution of Heart-lung Interaction in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome#861379
- Machine Learning Ventilator Decision System VS. Standard Controlled Ventilation#857377
- Post‑pandemic shifts in the age distribution of RSV, influenza A, and rhinovirus infections: A four‑year pediatric surveillance study#256179
- Physiotherapy in Thoracic Discopathy#967814
- The Effectiveness of Respiratory Tele-rehabilitation After COVID-19 Pneumonia Related: a Randomized Controlled Trial#1112317
Record · ID 832634
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive