PhilArchive
open access
Making Meaning Measurable: How to See Coherence in Decision Systems
How can institutional meaning be observed in practice? This paper shows how coherence in decision systems becomes visible through the criteria, indicators, and signals used for allocation and evaluation. It develops a framework for analysing how meaning is translated into measurable forms and demonstrates how institutions can be studied through their decision-relevant representations. This paper is part of the Coherence Programme.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Towards World Identification in Description Logics#101312
- What Gets Funded Depends on How Intent Is Translated: Translation Dynamics in Funding Systems (ERC, Novo Nordisk Foundation, Gates Foundation)#72512
- Coherence of Information: What It Is and Why It Matters#76315
- Description: Its meaning, epistemology, and use with emphasis on information science#709252
- Conscious Coherence: _A Substrate-Neutral Structural Model of Consciousness for Evaluating Artificial Candidates_#714103
Record · ID 83266
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive