RE-SCALE: Rehabilitation Engagement and Scaled Access With eXtended Reality and Artificial Intelligence

Background Chronic musculoskeletal pain, especially chronic low back pain (CLBP), is the leading cause of disability worldwide, with a burden expected to rise due to aging and increased longevity. Despite strong evidence supporting multimodal and non-pharmacological management-particularly active physical therapy and self-management-clinical practice still shows low adherence to guidelines, with excessive reliance on imaging, rest, injections, and surgery. Adherence to physical therapy remains one of the most significant barriers: only 40-50% of patients follow prescribed exercise programs. Factors include kinesiophobia, low motivation, and logistical obstacles. Mixed realities (XR: VR, AR, MR) offer solutions by enhancing motivation, reducing barriers, and personalizing rehabilitation. Evidence from systematic reviews shows VR-based rehabilitation can reduce pain, disability, and kinesiophobia, with immersive VR offering additional benefits like presence and habit-building. The SHARESPACE project developed and tested a novel XR rehabilitation environment for CLBP that integrates immersive VR/AR, tele-rehabilitation, real-time motor tracking, avatars for social support, and cognitive architectures for synchronization. Usability studies with patients, clinicians, and the general population confirm its feasibility and acceptance. SHARESPACE has completed phases 1 and 2 of XR intervention development (design and feasibility), now aiming to move to phase 3: large-scale clinical validation. Objectives The main goal is to evaluate not only short-term efficacy but long-term, as well as including more accurate and objective measures. A second objective is the commercial exploitation WE will valuate the efficacy, adherence, and cost-effectiveness of the SHARESPACE XR rehabilitation system compared to usual care in patients with CLBP. Specific objectives include: 1. To conduct a two-site randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing XR rehabilitation with conventional grou