ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Analgesia During Pediatric Digestive Endoscopy: a Comparison of Two Protocols for Procedural Sedation
The purpose of this study is to determine whether ketamine, midazolam, and meperidine are more effective than midazolam and meperidine alone for procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric digestive endoscopy. Secondary outcomes are the incidence of cardiorespiratory side effects and the necessity of rescue doses.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Intranasal and Oral Pharmacological Sedation in Pediatric Dentistry: A Thematic Scoping Review of Efficacy, Recovery, and Safety Outcomes.#1091354
- Nebulized vs. Oral Midazolam Sedation in Pediatric Anesthesia: A Randomized Comparative Study#863861
- Comparative efficacy and post-discharge adverse events of intranasal dexmedetomidine combined with different oral medications for procedural sedation in children: a randomized controlled trial.#165853
- Clinical Trial of Oral Midazolam in Pediatric Endoscopy#912222
- Dexmedetomidine Improved Oxygenation and Reduced Shunt in One-Lung Ventilation at High-Risk Pediatric Thoracic Surgery#1162005
Record · ID 833014
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive