ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of PROVISIONal 1-stent Strategy with DEB Versus Planned 2-stent Strategy in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.
\[The Purpose of the Clinical Study\] The purpose of this randomized comparison study is to compare the 1-stent strategy with a drug-eluting balloon and the 2-stent strategy in patients with non-LM coronary true-bifurcation lesions. \[Hypothesis\] In this study, the researchers intend to verify the hypothesis that the 1-stent strategy with a drug-eluting balloon is non-inferior to the 2-stent strategy in terms of target lesion failures (cardiac death, target vessel MI, or target vessel revascularization).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Prospective, Multi-Center, Random. Study of CoStar Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent(Direct Stenting vs. Pre-Dilatation)#824950
- Drug-eluting Stents vs. Drug-coated Balloon for Preventing Recurrent In-stent Restenosis#887495
- DUrable Polymer-based STent CHallenge of Promus Element Versus ReSolute Integrity in an All Comers Population#810632
- Second-generation Drug-eluting Stents in Diabetes#828685
- Optimal Stenting Strategy For True Bifurcation Lesions#981506
Record · ID 833216
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive