ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Trans Radial Versus Transfemoral Route for Coronary Angiography
The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the feasibility, success and safety of Transradial approach (TRA) verses Transfemoral approach (TFA) for diagnostic and therapeutic coronary angiography and coronary interventions, in terms of procedural time, access time, fluoroscopy time, procedural failure, , length of hospital stay in terms of days in hospital, Complications in terms of thrombophlebitis, hematoma, ecchymosis, infections thrombosis of vessel, MACE, Stroke and others.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Randomized Comparison of Distal Radial Versus Conventional Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention#887945
- Distal Versus Conventional Transradial Artery Access for Coronary Catheterization in Patients With STEMI#915905
- Distal Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.#1125403
- Randomized Comparison of JUDkins vs tiGEr Catheter in Coronary Angiography Via the Right Radial Artery: the JUDGE Study#896027
- Decrease Artery Occlusion by Distal Radial Arterial Cannulation in ACS Patients#1088012
Record · ID 833340
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive