ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
The Comparison of Thick Split-thickness Skin Graft Versus Thin Split-thickness Skin Graft
In clinical settings, split-thickness skin graft (STSG) remain the gold standard for covering large skin defects. However, STSGs usually bring complications to the donor sites. The study objective was to compare the efficacy of thick split-thickness skin graft versus thin split-thickness skin graft in the reconstruction of the donor site.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluation of the Use of Minced Skin Grafts for Promoting Donor Site Wound Healing After Split-Thickness Skin Grafting#981780
- Autologous Fat Grafting Beneath Penile Split Thickness Skin Graft Placement During Penile Reconstruction#870172
- RECELL® System Combined With Meshed Autograft for Reduction of Donor Skin Harvesting in Soft Tissue Reconstruction#896044
- Coupling Negative Pressure Wound Therapy With Instillation#830155
- The Dermisgraft Epithelialization and Late Scar Healing#860820
Record · ID 833435
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive