ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
DIVision of the Interlobar Fissure in Patients Who Do Not Respond to Endobronchial Lung Volume Reduction
Surgical division of fissure is hypothesized to be safe and feasible. However, there is no preparatory study to test this hypothesis. It is logically expected that morbidity from the procedure could be less than standard LVRS and in preparation to a side-to-side trial of fissure division versus standard LVRS, a safety and feasibility study is required to test this hypothesis and inform future trial design.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Role of Lung Ultrasound in Confirmation of Correct Double Lumen Endotracheal Tube Placement in Thoracic Surgeries#1033345
- LUng voluMe reductIoN by DuAl ENergy CT Evaluation (LUMINANCE) Study#1125227
- Effects of Sugammadex and Conventional Reversal on Lung Function in Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery#844325
- IVC Window Agreement Study#861020
- Thoracic Drains in Intensive Care Units: Comparison of Seldinger and Surgical Methods#978899
Record · ID 833898
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive