ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Open Versus Laparoscopically-assisted Esophagectomy for Cancer
To compare laparoscopically-assisted gastric mobilization versus open gastric mobilization in Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, with open thoracic approach in the 2 arms.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Innovations in Gastric Cancer Surgery During Early Minimally Invasive Era and Future Perspectives.#399641
- The Influence of Splenic Artery Characteristics in Gastric Cancer Surgery#1044619
- Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes of Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Single-Center, Single-Arm Prospective Study#465447
- Robotic, Laparoscopic and Open Gastrectomy Compared on Short and Long Term Outcomes#895622
- An Organ Preservation Strategies After Chemoradiotherapy Combined With Immunotherapy for Esophageal Cancer (PALACE3).#405148
Record · ID 834690
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive