ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparing Endoglide to Endoserter for DSAEK Graft Insertion
The purpose of this study is to compare the Tan EndoGlide with the new Endoserter injector in terms of damage to the donor corneal endothelium by comparing the endothelial cell loss at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year post DSAEK (Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty)surgery. There is no data comparing this two injectors.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Predictive Factors of Good Results After Primary Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK)#880929
- Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DALK) Using Acellular Corneal Tissue Promotes Corneal Allograft Survival in High Risk Patients#861385
- Comparative Results After DSAEK, UT-DSAEK and DMEK for Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystophy#917706
- DMEK And Cataract Surgery: Comparison Of Sequential Versus Combined Procedure#906684
- Deep Lamellar Endothelial Keratoplasty: Small Incision Technique#897538
Record · ID 834979
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive