Conceptio › Archive › PhilArchive
PhilArchive open access

Cognitive Biases and Political Obligation

Gur, Noam · 2025
PhilArchive · Papers · 2025
Open Source ↗
philosophy
This chapter approaches the question of political obligation from a functional standpoint, focusing particularly on law’s function as a bias-counteracting device. Following a few preliminary clarifications (section 25.1), the chapter presents and explains law’s bias-counteracting function, drawing, inter alia, on relevant empirical literature (section 25.2). It then considers what law’s bias-counteracting function entails for the desirable mode of practical reasoning in response to legal requirements (section 25.3). Finally, it highlights some of the implications for the question of political obligation (section 25.4). This is done with specific attention to a necessity justification for political obligation, a fairness justification for political obligation, and their synergetic combination.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 83516
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive