ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Evaluation of Two Different Techniques for Sinus Elevation, Open Versus Closed .
A clinical Trial, comparing two different techniques to elevate the maxillary sinus floor membrane to allow for simultaneous dental implant placement in the severely atrophied maxillary ridges.Both using allogenic bone substitute as the bone graft material. One technique is the open lateral window technique and the second is the closed crestal technique.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Application of Virtual Mandibular Position in Temporomandibular Jont Reconstruction With Costochondral Graft in Children Jaw Deformity#992267
- Biphasic Material With PRF in Lateral Sinus Floor Augmentation#1094035
- Transcrestal Sinus Lift With OSSIX Bone vs BIOSS Collagen#1138282
- Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using blood without graft material. Preliminary results in 10 patients#947946
- Management of Distally Extension Maxillary Atrophied Ridge With Two Different Minimal Invasive Treatment Modalities#833249
Record · ID 835210
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive