ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Influence of Two Different Flap Designs for Sinus Floor Elevation
It is assumed that the reduction of the flap dimension could provide a reduction of surgical time, post surgical complications and patient's discomfort when compared with the traditional surgical approach.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- In-office Placement of the Propel Mini Sinus Implant in the Frontal Sinus Ostia#826509
- Efficacy of Piezosurgery Versus Conventional Osteotomy in Prelacrimal Approach Targeting Different Maxillary Sinus Pathologies#878897
- Dexmedetpmidine Versus Ketamine for Postoperative Sore Throat in Sinus Surgery#844995
- The Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery#1128277
- Extended Endoscopic Approaches to Non-malignant Maxillary Sinus Lesions Comparative#842220
Record · ID 835244
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive