ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Li-Hep vs. Non-Li-Hep Coated Transfer Device
This study is a prospective, diagnostic, cohort study within the standard care of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. It compares the analytical performance of Siemens® point-of-care high sensitive troponin I testing in venous, plasma and capillary sample types. The investigators hypothesize that there is a good correlation between the Siemens® POC HS cTnI assay results for the three sample types and that the bias between different POC sample types reduces from \~10% to ≤ 5% when using heparinized transfer device for the capillary sample.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Fingerstick Versus Venous Sample for Troponin I.#906001
- Variations of High Sensitivity Troponin T in Neonates#901145
- Finding Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS) With Serial Troponin Testing for Rapid Assessment of Cardiac Ischemic Symptoms#889060
- Evaluation of Serial Troponin and Cardiac Multimarkers at the Point of Care in the Emergency Department#828007
- CASTRO1 - Study on CRP Apheresis After Ischemic Stroke#863980
Record · ID 835847
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive