ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Radiofrequency in Sacroiliac Arthropathy;Bipolar RF 6 Points Versus Monopolar RF at 6 and 3 Points
Expecting using bipolar RF at six points, in spite of potentially consuming more intraoperative time, to be more effective and long lasting in the management of pain resultant from chronic sacroiliac joint arthropathy than the other 2 techniques using the monopolar RF even if using six points.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison Between Traditional Bipolar Radiofrequency and Cooled Radiofrequency in Sacroiliac Joint Pain Patients#894353
- Efficacy of Multimodal Analgesia Following Hip Arthroscopy#864126
- Conventional vs Bipolar SIJ RFA for Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pain#1101059
- Pain Treatment for Sciatica#905212
- Trial Comparing Treatment With SInergy™ System to Conservative Treatment for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain#801709
Record · ID 836128
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive