Rethinking Fairness in Unsupervised Healthcare AI: A Methodological Scoping Review

sciences sciences Making sure you're not a bot! Loading... You are seeing this because the administrator of this website has set up Anubis to protect the server against the scourge of AI companies aggressively scraping websites. This can and does cause downtime for the websites, which makes their resources inaccessible for everyone. Anubis is a compromise. Anubis uses a Proof-of-Work scheme in the vein of Hashcash, a proposed proof-of-work scheme for reducing email spam. The idea is that at individual scales the additional load is ignorable, but at mass scraper levels it adds up and makes scraping much more expensive. Ultimately, this is a placeholder solution so that more time can be spent on fingerprinting and identifying headless browsers (EG: via how they do font rendering) so that the challenge proof of work page doesn't need to be presented to users that are much more likely to be legitimate. Please note that Anubis requires the use of modern JavaScript features that plugins like JShelter will disable. Please disable JShelter or other such plugins for this domain. Protected by Anubis From Techaro . Mascot design by CELPHASE . This website is running Anubis version devel .

Related documents

• From Fairness Findings to Fairness Claims: An Evidence Classification Scheme for Clinical AI#440273
• Why Fairness Cannot Be Automated: Bridging the Gap Between EU Non-Discrimination Law and AI#485929
• Where are the Humans? A Scoping Review of Fairness in Multi-agent AI Systems#19060
• Fairness as Equal Concession: Critical Remarks on Fair AI#75346
• A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning#1108059