ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparative Evaluation of Osseous Resection by Piezoelectric Device Versus Conventional Rotary Instruments
The aim of this study is to comparatively evaluate changes in periodontal healing, surgical time required and postoperative morbidity observed in patients undergoing osseous resection in crown lengthening procedure with conventional rotary instruments versus piezoelectric device.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- "Effects of Piezocision vs Micro-osteoperforations on the Rate of Maxillary Canine Retraction#1138232
- Evaluating Laser and Piezocision vs. Piezocision Alone on Root Resorption and Gingival Health During Tooth Retraction#842958
- Effect of Piezoelectric Surgery on Quality of Life and Periradicular Healing After Endodontic Surgery#1088418
- Leukocyte- and Platelet Rich Fibrin (L-PRF) Application in Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Removal Surgery#862676
- Treatment of Residual Pockets in Periodontal Patients Using an Oscillating Chitosan Device#805717
Record · ID 837007
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive