ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Influence of Operator Factors on Succes and Survival of Indirect Restorations
Background: Nowadays, tissue preserving, aesthetically high-quality and sustainable dentistry is more and more becoming the standard way of treatment. To reach those standards, one of the treatment options is applying a partial indirect restoration made by glass ceramics using immediate dental sealing (IDS). Using IDS, a protocol is followed to applicate a dentin bonding agent to freshly cut dentin when it is exposed during tooth preparation for indirect restorations (inlays/onlays, crowns). The preparation made for partial restorations is minimal invasive. Glass ceramic restorations have very high survival rates (90 to 100% after five years) (Morimoto et al., 2016) and glass ceramic mimics the color and structure of the tooth very well. This kind of treatment is gaining interest and increasingly applied however little information is available on the long-term effects when multiple general practitioners apply these restorations. Objectives: The main goal of this study is to evaluate partial posterior ceramic restorations with the application of an immediate dentin sealing (IDS) performed by various practitioners. Study design and population: Twenty dental practitioners, who followed a course on making ceramic partial restorations using IDS, will be asked to include patients for this study. The dental practitioners are being asked to share their data (occlusal light photo's, impression and x-rays) of twenty-five restorations they make after having the course. Restorations of individuals with a minimum age of 18 will be included. The information from pictures and impressions will be evaluated. Items to evaluate The practitioners will be interviewed to get to know in what circumstances they do their treatment. Items that are discussed are: * using rubber dam; * using magnification by means of loupes/microscope; * scheduled time for the treatment; * number of restorations after following the course. Initial data (gathered directly after treatment) will be evalua
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparing Minimally Invasive Techniques Used In Treatment Of Carious Primary Molars In Children#802491
- Direct Versus Indirect Endocrowns on Endodontically Treated Molars#980978
- Predictable Method for Restoring Endodontically Treated Teeth, Comparing Indirect and Direct Methods and Materials in Aesthetic Dentistry.#905843
- Push-out bond strength of zinc oxide eugenol sealer, bioceramic sealer and bioactive glass sealer to dentin among heat generated thermoplasticized gutta-percha technique.#662775
- Oral Hygiene Tools for Biofilm Removal Around Implants#886130
Record · ID 838610
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive