Comparison of the Non-invasive Approach and Fetal Exome Sequencing in Prenatal Diagnosis When Fetal Ultrasound Signs Are Discovered

The discovery of congenital malformations and/or non-specific signs by ultrasound (5% of pregnancies) represents a real medical challenge. Their prognosis is variable depending on the underlying etiology, ranging from acquired fetopathies to rare genetic diseases. In France, the diagnostic approach is currently based on imaging examinations (ultrasound, brain MRI, 3D bone scans, etc.) and/or biological examinations, generally on invasive sampling (trophoblast biopsy, amniocentesis or fetal blood puncture) with infectious (CMV, toxoplasmosis, parvovirus B19, etc.), metabolic (enzymes in the bloodstream, etc.), and genetic (standard karyotype, FISH, array CGH and targeted gene sequencing) investigations. The yield of this strategy is about 30%, leaving 70% of couples without a possible prognosis. Over the last decade, medical genetics has undergone a technological revolution with the development of high-throughput DNA sequencing (HTS) allowing the analysis of targeted genes (panel) or the exome (ES). International studies published on the use of ES in prenatal diagnosis (PND) have become more common, with variable inclusion criteria, resulting in diagnostic rates between 15 and 36%, higher than those of array CGH (8-15%). In France, FHU TRANSLAD coordinates the national pilot study AnDDI-PRENATOME, which has made it possible to remove the technological barriers for PND ES and to obtain a diagnostic yield of 39% in 33 days on average. In parallel, the recent development of NIPD (Non-invasive prenatal screening) on free fetal DNA circulating in maternal blood has made it possible to propose a non-invasive strategy. However, this technique is currently used in prenatal care only in a few indications: determination of the fetal sex, search for aneuploidies, analysis of the fetal rhesus status or, more rarely, the targeted diagnosis of monogenic diseases. The team in Strasbourg has recently conducted a pilot study using an NIPD-panel in couples with a history of neomutat