ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
The Initial Double-Blind Drug-Eluting Stent vs Bare-Metal Stent Study.
The main objective of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the sirolimus coated Bx VELOCITY stent in reducing angiographic in-stent late loss in de novo native coronary lesions as compared to the bare metal Bx VELOCITY balloon-expandable stent. Both stents will be mounted on the Raptor Rapid Exchange Delivery Stent System.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Sirolimus-eluting Stent CALYPSO vs Everolimus-eluting Stent XIENCE#980409
- Evaluation of Effectiveness and Safety of BIOMATRIX Stent (IRIS-BIOMATRIX)#881126
- Study Safety and Performance of the Biomime Stent in Patients With Single, De Novo, Non-Complex Coronary Lesions#873484
- Registry to Evaluate Efficacy of Xience/Promus Versus Cypher in Reducing Late Loss After Stenting#881052
- Limus Eluted From A Durable Versus ERodable Stent Coating#1058936
Record · ID 839021
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive