PhilArchive
open access
Short version. Thought Experiment: Free Evaluator
The second major antinatal argument has been developed. “Does life in general and in particular deserve to be lived before beginning from a position of choice with full/partial information about its quality?” To answer this question, I developed a complex thought experiment. This is a short version that can be read in half an hour. I must warn the reader that I am a freak, a marginal, and a loner. I have no affiliation; I am a so-called "independent researcher," someone who has suffered critically in life. The quality and "seriousness" of my work suffers greatly from the fact that I am outside of an academic environment.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- I Was Born Not by My Decision, but by My Parents’ Decision#109114
- Putting the ‘Experiment’ back into the ‘Thought Experiment’#88235
- Introduction: Cognitive attitudes and values in science#752289
- Perception and Perspective#89779
- The Difference Between Being Born and Not Being Born: A Reflection Through the Lens of Free Will and Balance#113865
Record · ID 83922
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive