ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Visual Outcomes After Implantation of the POD FT and the POD F
There is no difference of the photic phenomena in the two groups. The study will be a prospective non-randomised controlled study. The target is then to determine the equivalence in the glare. Assumption of Type I error is p=0.05 as level of significance and Type II error is alpha=0.8 as power.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ISNT Rule in Normal Population#1153703
- Funktionsimaging der Retinalen Mikrozirkulation (FIRC 1) - Teilprojekt FIRC 1-A (FIRC1-TUI) : Schlussbericht ; [Verbundprojekt: Ophthalmoinnovation Thüringen - Teilvorhaben: Startprojekt zum Funktionsimaging der Netzhautzirkulation - Grundlagen A (FIRC1-A-TUI)] ; [Laufzeit: 01.01.2001 - 31.10.2003]#1124319
- Evaluation of a Novel Head-Mounted Device for Glaucoma Testing: A Proof-of-Concept Study#880770
- Quantifying the link between retinal performance and the optomotor response#144768
- Comprehensive Evaluation of Visual Function#1170516
Record · ID 839836
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive