ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Validity of Fluorescence-Based Devices Versus Visual-Tactile Method in Detection of Secondary Caries Around Resin Composite Restorations: Invivo Diagnostic Accuracy Study
This study will be conducted to evaluate the clinical performance and validity of both light-induced fluorescence intraoral camera and laser-induced fluorescence device in comparison to visual-tactile assessment method in detection of secondary caries around margins of resin composite restorations.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Near Infrared Technology for the Detection of Proximal Caries#881281
- Automated Caries Detection Using a 3D Intraoral Scanner. An in Vivo Validation Study.#916226
- Detection of Non-cavitated Occlusal Caries Lesions by Visual Inspection, LF, QLF and NILT#852383
- Efficacy of Resin Infiltration of Proximal Caries#1089176
- Balanço de energia em painel fotovoltaico : um estudo experimental#393222
Record · ID 840107
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive