Effect of CPAP Versus APAP in Patients With Obesity Undergoing Bariatric Surgery Protocol

Introduction Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disorder in obese patients, especially those undergoing bariatric surgery. OSA is characterized by upper airway obstruction during sleep, leading to intermittent hypoxia and sleep fragmentation. Obesity and OSA are closely related conditions that can exacerbate each other. Positive airway pressure therapy is essential for managing OSA, but adherence to therapy can be challenging, particularly in patients who experience rapid physiological changes after bariatric surgery. Objective This study aims to determine whether automatic positive airway pressure therapy (APAP) improves nightly usage hours compared to continuous positive airway pressure therapy (CPAP) in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Secondary objectives include evaluating the percentage of nights with therapy use over 4 hours, reduction of the residual apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), changes in daytime sleepiness, pressure requirements, side effects, sleep-related quality of life, reduction in in-person visits, and optimization of healthcare resources. Methodology A randomized, parallel-group, open-label, controlled clinical trial will be conducted. Adult patients eligible for bariatric surgery with a diagnosis of moderate to severe OSA (AHI \> 15) requiring positive pressure therapy will be included. Participants will be randomized to receive either APAP or CPAP. Follow-up will be conducted over 12 months after surgery, with assessments at 3, 6, and 12 months. Data will be collected on treatment adherence, residual AHI, OSA symptoms, daytime sleepiness, quality of life, and treatment costs. APAP therapy is expected to improve nightly usage hours compared to CPAP. It is also expected that APAP will show better adaptation to changing pressure needs after bariatric surgery. Data will be analyzed to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-efficiency of both therapies. This study will provide evidence on the efficacy of APAP compared to CPAP in obes