ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison Study Between Two Techniques for Correction of Upper Lid Retraction in Patients With Grave's Orbitopathy
Grave's ophthalmopathy is the most common cause of orbital disease in adults. The clinical presentation may vary between sub clinic symptoms to severe ones. The eyelid retraction is one of the most important signs of Grave's ophthalmopathy and can lead to cosmetic and functional problems. The eyelid retraction can be found in the inflammatory stage and in the chronic disease, when it is stable. It can be described when the upper lid is contouring the superior limbus or positioned above that. This condition can lead to dry eye symptoms, exposure keratitis and cosmetic issues. The treatment can may be surgical or medical. The medical treatment are usually based on controlling thyroid function and in the use of steroids, both are not specific for the lid retraction, but for the inflammation that is common in the disease. In the longstanding disease, surgery is the most efficient treatment. There are several described techniques, they are based on the concept of weakening the muscles that act on lid elevation (levator and Muller Muscle). Basically the techniques can be divided in two groups: the first with an anterior approach (with skin scar in the lid sulcus) and the second using a posterior approach (through the conjunctiva). In the literature there is no consensus in deciding the best technique, regarding cosmetic results, incidence of complications, hypo or hypercorrection. In this trial we propose to compare two distinct techniques that are already in clinical use. The blepharotomy uses a cutaneous approach and the other a conjunctival approach. The patients will be divided in two randomized groups and surgical expected outcomes, cosmetics outcomes and complications occurrence will be compared.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Comparative Study Between Laser and Manual Removal of Corneal Epithelium for Photorefractive Keratectomy#1162376
- Resurfacing of Foot and Distal Leg Soft Tissue Defects Using Reversed Pedicled Peroneal Artery Flaps Augmented by Superficial Sural Artery#876056
- Primary Wound Closure Using a Limberg Flap Versus Secondary Wound Healing Following Pilonidal Sinus Excision#859447
- Comparison of Simple and Continuous Suture Techniques in Oral Surgery#902939
- A Prospective Comparison of Suture Removal Time for Simple Surgical Defects of the Head and Neck#870476
Record · ID 840788
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive