ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Dilation and Curettage Versus Operative Hysteroscopy for Missed Abortion
Randomizedtrial comparing success and complication rates of operative hysteroscopy versus traditional dilation and curettage (D\&C) in the management of first trimester missed abortion.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Operative Hysteroscopy Versus Suction Curettage for Surgical Termination of Early Pregnancy Loss (Miscarriage)#836622
- Effectiveness and safety of medication abortion with vs without screening ultrasonography or pelvic examination.#340453
- Embryoscopic Evacuation for Induced Abortion#849629
- Misoprostol for Second Trimester Pregnancy Termination#872549
- Total Laparoscopic Hystrectomy Versus Total Abdominal Hystrectomy#909172
Record · ID 840939
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive