ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Compact Closed System Versus Mounted Open System (COSMOS)
The purpose of this study is to investigate, in a prospective and randomized fashion, the clinical performance of a closed intravenous system versus an open conventional one, with respect to ease of handling and effectiveness (as defined by time of survival without complications), security provided to professionals and patients against accidental blood exposure or needlestick injury, catheter-related complications such as phlebitis, pain and blockage and overall costs of the two systems.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effect Of Open And Closed System Peripheral Catheters Used In Pediatric Services#1174215
- Procedural and Therapy Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: A Framework for Safety, Quality and Patient‐Centred Care#254229
- Comparing Through-the-Needle With Suture-Method Catheter Designs for Popliteal Nerve Blocks#826220
- Study Comparing the Handling of Two Peripheral IV Catheter Systems#903082
- Comparison of Continuous Wound Catheter Infusion Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion in Abdominal Surgery#1095421
Record · ID 841216
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive