ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparing the Diagnostic Efficacy of Different Suction Techniques for EUS-FNB of Pancreatic Solid Lesions
There are many factors that can affect the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA, including lesion factors, the endoscoist experience, the needle size, the number of needle passes, and the suction technique. since diagnostic efficacy of different suction techniques for EUS-FNB is still uncertain, thus we decided to compare the diagnostic efficacy of three common methods: the 10 ml standard negative pressure, slow pull and wet suction.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Two Endoscopic Biopsic Needles for Pancreatic Tumors#1095030
- Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Masses: Histological and Immunohistochemical Evaluation#840837
- Diagnostic Yield of 20-gauge Procore Needle for EUS-guided FNA Biopsy in Solid Pancreatic Lesions#846880
- The Accurateness of Endoscopic Ultrasound Elastography in the Guidance of EUS-FNA in Solid Pancreatic Lesions#1060272
- Prospective Study Comparing Methods of Obtainment of Specimen After EUS-FNA in Patients With Peri-pancreatic Mass#832711
Record · ID 841364
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive