ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
CardioFocus vs. Contact Force Guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
The aim of the study is to compare the acute procedure and safety outcomes as well as long term clinical outcomes of 2 groups of patients treated with the HeartLight® Endoscopically Guided Laser Ablation (EGLA) or a commercially available Contact Force Sensing Irrigated Radiofrequency (RF) Ablation Catheter plus, at the operator's discretion, 3D Electroanatomical Mapping (EAM) for the treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PAF).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Eagle AF (Atrial Fibrillation) - Endoscopically Guided Laser Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation#870986
- VAscular Closure for Cardiac Ablation Registry (VACCAR)#1101988
- HeartLight X3 Endoscopic Ablation System With Excalibur Balloon for Treatment of Symptomatic Persistent AF#801820
- Atrial Fibrillation Force Contact Ablation Study#857934
- First Line Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation Treatment (The RAAFT Study)#1124965
Record · ID 841491
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive