ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of the Efficacy of Continuous Metaraminol Infusion Versus Continuous Norepinephrine Infusion for the Prevention of Hypotension During Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anaesthesia. A Randomised Controlled Trial.
The aim of this double-blind randomised study will be to compare a fixed-rate prophylactic metaraminol infusion to a fixed-rate prophylactic norepinephrine infusion during elective cesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- EFFECT OF DIFFERENT NOREPINPHRINE APPLICATION METHODS IN CAESARIANES ON HYPOTENSION AFTER SPINAL ANESTHESIA#1088173
- Comparison of Two Doses of Norepinephrine in Preventing Hypotension After Spinal Anesthesia#858523
- 90% Effective Dose of Norepinephrine Infusions Under Intensive and Standard Treatment#871648
- Evaluate Efficacy Levobupivacaine 0.125% Versuss Ropivacaine 0.2% in Hemodynamic Alterations in Labor and Fetal Repercussions#1030574
- Norepinephrine to Prevent Hypotension in Ceasrean Delivery#969413
Record · ID 842206
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive