ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Mainstream Sleep Tracking Devices vs Polysomnography
The purpose of this study is to compare two popular portable sleep monitoring devices-the Fitbit Charge®, Jawbone UP®, and SleepTime smartphone app-to the "gold standard" Polysomnography (PSG). Parameters that will be analyzed include sleep onset latency, sleep efficiency, and sleep staging. Specifically, this study will investigate the validity of the Jawbone UP®, Fitbit Charge®, and SleepTime app in detecting sleep and wakefulness in comparison to conventional Polysomnography (PSG).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Suicide Sleep Monitoring (Ssleem)#1100733
- Sleep Bruxism, Pharmacotherapy, Sleep Aspects and Screen Use in Children and Adolescents With Down Syndrome: A Cluster Analysis.#380676
- The Impact of CBT-i on CPAP Therapy Use and Drop Outs in OSAS Patients With Insomnia.#894820
- Managing Sleep-wake Disruption Due to Hospitalisation: the Circadian Care Project#919124
- The intervention effect of caffeine oral tablets on mental fatigue induced by nap deprivation: based on assessments of heart rate variability, cognitive performance and subjective fatigue-a pilot study.#338378
Record · ID 845140
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive