ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Smart-phone Application Versus Conventional Paper for the Documentation of Voiding Dysfunction in Children
The objective of the research is to compare the written voiding diary method to the smart-phone diary, DryDawn®, which the investigators selected among several applications using specific criteria appropriate to our population. The investigators aim is to describe the method that proves to be most efficient by assessing which diary provides the best quality and amount of information, and draws the highest level of satisfaction from participants. Patient satisfaction will be assessed using a questionnaire that was designed for use in this study.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluation of the Efficacy of Non-drug Therapy (SMS Intervention) for Adolescents With NSSI#852270
- Treatment of Overactive Bladder With a Digital Conversational Agent: the MOTIVATION Study#871979
- Clinically Important or Just Statistically Significant? MCID for DVISS and PIN-Q in Children With UI#835499
- Text Messaging and Cardiovascular Health in Diabetes Mellitus#874291
- Digitally Assisted Behavioral Physical Activity Intervention in Fibromyalgia#868206
Record · ID 845706
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive