ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Ivermectin Versus Standard Treatment in Mild COVID-19
Rationale: Ivermectin, an inexpensive and available antiparasitic drug, with favourable safety profile, showed inhibitory effect on SARS-CoV2 viral replication in-vitro and in animal models. Several research groups investigated Ivermectin in COVID-19, particularly in mild symptomatic disease. There is high degree of uncertainty on its effects on clinical outcomes and larger studies are needed. Objectives: Plan to study the effect of Ivermectin versus standard treatment in patients with confirmed mild COVID-19. Study design: Multi-centre prospective cohort study Settings: Assiut University Hospital (Assiut University), Aswan and others, Egypt. Study Population: Patients with confirmed mild COVID-19. Intervention: Patients with mild symptomatic COVID-19 attending the participating out-patient clinics in different centers will receive either Ivermectin + Standard treatment or Standard treatment only. All new mild symptomatic COVID-19 patients will receive Ivermectin + Standard treatment for the first two weeks of the study. During the following four weeks, all new patients will receive standard treatment only. These cycles will be repeated until 822 patients are recruited in each arm. Patients assigned to Ivermectin + Standard treatment or standard treatment only will remain as such throughout the study and during the follow- up period. Primary outcome measures: The primary outcome will be rate of intensive care admission. Secondary outcome measures: Secondary outcomes will be time to clinical improvement, the clinical state using 7-point ordinal scale at different time points, need for home oxygenation, hospitalization, hospital supplemental oxygen \>24 hours, Non- invasive ventilation ( High- flow nasal cannula, High- velocity nasal insufflation or BiPAP), duration of hospitalization, duration of ICU stay and deaths within 21 days,. Power calculation: With a prospective cohort design, a sample size of 822 cases per group is estimated (1644 for the whole study)
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparative Immunogenicity of Respiratory Virus Vaccines (CIRV2) Study#839270
- A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of Ivermectin for COVID-19#459966
- Statistical and Epidemiological Study Based on the Use of Convalescent Plasma for the Management of Patients With COVID-19#841774
- IFN-beta 1b and Remdesivir for COVID19#1096947
- SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 Study of Next Generation Non-Invasive Passive Detection Technologies (Level42)#1059048
Record · ID 845941
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive