ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Omitting Drains After Repair of Peptic Ulcer Perforations
. This study aimed to evaluate ERAS application outcomes via omitting the intraabdominal drains compared to regular using of the drains in patients undergoing perforated duodenal ulcer repairs in emergency abdominal surgeries.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Impact of Abdominal Drains on the ERAS Pathway in Peptic Perforation#1172468
- PT-GBD to EUS-GBD Conversion Versus Standard Management in High-Risk Acute Cholecystitis Patients#852506
- Efficacy of Retrograde Fill Vs Spontaneous Fill to Assess Voiding Function#804210
- EUS-Guided Gallbladder Drainage Versus Conservative Management in Patients Unfit for Surgery After a Biliary Event Without Cholecystitis. DRECON Study#899420
- Colectomy Reconstruction for Ulcerative Colitis, Ileorectal Anastomosis vs Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Ulcerative Colitis.#909836
Record · ID 845999
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive