Optimizing Maintenance Therapy in COPD Patients

Background: Effectiveness of maintenance therapy for COPD with Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) requires an optimal Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate (PIFR), a proper inhalation technique and adequate medication adherence from patients. Recent studies have suggested that patients with reduced peak inspiratory flow may have worse COPD-related symptom burden and increased risk of COPD-related hospitalizations. However, in primary care, little is known about how many COPD patients have suboptimal PIFR. Furthermore, there is a paucity of knowledge concerning the associations of PIFR, inhalation technique and medication adherence with the effectiveness of maintenance therapy. Objective: To examine associations of PIFR, inhalation technique, and medication adherence with health status and disease, exacerbations, and healthcare resource utilization in patients with COPD receiving maintenance treatment with dry powder inhalers. Study design: Cross-sectional observational study in five European countries\*. Study population: COPD patients aged 40 years or older who have received COPD maintenance therapy through DPIs in the past 3 months or longer. Main study parameters: Health status as measured with the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), COPD Assessment Test (CAT), number of exacerbations, an assessment of PIFR, inhalation technique errors, medication adherence, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), medication use and demographic and clinical covariates. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: No significant burden from participating is expected. Risk of participating is deemed negligible. In addition, patients may benefit from participating. Specifically, patients who manifest inhalation errors, will receive a tailored inhalation instruction to remediate their inhalation errors. The impact of this instruction will not be evaluated in any way, therefore it should not be seen as an intervention. \* If the preplanned