ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Articaine 4% Versus Lidocaine 2% for Local Anesthesia of MIH-affected Maxillary Molars
Comparison of injection pain with lidocaine and articaine. Comparison of the efficacy of lidocaine and articaine during treatment of MIH- maxillary molars. Design: A randomized, controlled, crossover, Triple-blinding clinical study including twenty six cooperative children, aged 6-12years old
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Local Anesthesia With Lidocaine or Articaine for Molars Affected by MIH#912713
- Comparative study on the anesthetic efficacy between Articaine 4% and Lidocaine 2% in blocking the included lower third molars.#411567
- Analgesic Efficacy of Two Doses of Dexmedetomidine as Adjuncts to Lidocaine for Intravenous Regional Anesthesia#1113189
- Reversing the Effects of 2% Lidocaine#1086936
- The Comparison of Supraperiosteal Nerve Block With Opiate Analgesia in Alleviating the Pain of Toothache#980714
Record · ID 846484
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive