ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Lidocaine Versus Bupivacaine in Orthognathic Surgery
In this research study, we want to learn more about the impact of two different local anesthetics (bupivacaine and lidocaine) on patient experience following orthognathic (jaw) surgery. Both anesthetics are within the standard of care for dental and orthognathic procedures, but can vary in how quickly they take action and how long they last. This study will provide us with a greater understanding of how anesthetic choice affect patient outcomes, and how we can strive to make these outcomes as favorable as possible.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Intrathecal Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine and Clonidine in Paediatrics Age Group:A Comparative Evaluation#811999
- Split Face Study of the Duration of Local Anesthetics#847402
- Feasibility Study: Evaluate the Effectiveness of Using a Topical Anesthetic Prior to Ultherapy™ Treatment#896882
- Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine Plus Lidocaine in Infraclavicular Block#1057209
- A Comparison of Rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg and Remifentanil 2 µg/kg in Elderly Patients Over 80 Years#1096022
Record · ID 846622
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive