ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
The LAMA Trial: Laparoscopic Correction of Perforated Peptic Ulcer Versus Open Correction
This is a multicenter trial comparing laparoscopic correction of a perforated peptic ulcer with the open technique by upper laparotomy. Hypothesis is that after laparoscopic correction will be discharged 3 days sooner due to less postoperative pain and complications.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Trial for Single Port Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Colectomy#900564
- Longitudinal Incision Versus Cruciate Incision in the Construction of an End Colostomy#1115307
- Trial Comparing Early Laparoscopic Enterolysis Versus Nonoperative Management for High-grade SBO#840228
- Fistulodesis Pilot Study for Closure of Perianal Fistulae#1164892
- Study Comparing Early Laparoscopy With Active Observation in Acute Non-specific Abdominal Pain#812324
Record · ID 846692
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive