ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Polyp Detection and False Alarm Rates in Water Exchange and Air Insufflation Colonoscopy
Water exchange (WE) improves adenoma detection rate (ADR) but missed polyps occur due to human limitations. Computer-aided detection (CADe) improves polyp detection and can overcome human omissions, but a limiting factor is feces and air bubbles related false alarms (FA). WE provides salvage cleansing and can potentially reduce FA. The investigators compared the additional polyp detection rate (APDR) and false alarm rate (FAR) by CADe between WE and air insufflation.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effect of Water Exchange Method on Adenoma Miss Rates in Patients Undergoing Selective Polypectomy#1172538
- Gastrointestinal Tract Polyp Detection, Tracking, and Surveillance and the Role of Artificial Intelligence.#330821
- Computer-assisted Detection of Colonic Polyps#1060857
- LCI (Linked Color Imaging) for Adenoma Detection in the Right Colon#1171616
- The Usefulness of I-scan in Screening Colonoscopy#1045352
Record · ID 847101
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive