PhilArchive
open access
Amnesia and Punishment
Should punishment be abated for offenders suffering from amnesia? Philosophers have largely overlooked this question. Extant views cluster around a straightforward answer: deserving punishment depends on remembering one’s crime. However, arguments for that view rely on implausible assumptions; the view also implies that offenders could manipulate how much punishment they deserve. Instead, uneasiness about punishing amnesiacs should be traced to distinctive grounds for showing mercy. Amnesiacs who cannot access their past motives are unable to fully comprehend their own role in bringing punishment upon themselves and unable to situate their decisions within a satisfying narrative arc of their lives.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Erasure of the past: How failure to remember can be a morally blameworthy act#762812
- Minds, Brains, and Desert: On the relevance of neuroscience for retributive punishment#771388
- The passions of punishment#738883
- Punishment and Remorse#693830
- Who Should Take Care of Offenders with Dementia? Some Thoughts on Fading Selves and the Challenge of Responsibility Ascriptions#724364
Record · ID 84766
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive