ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparative Effectiveness of Prophylactic ICD Versus Non-ICD Therapy
The investigators aim to compare the risk of mortality of Non-implantable carioverter defibrillator (ICD) vs. ICD management in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Defibrillation Testing During Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Replacement#828543
- Follow-up of Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators by Home Monitoring (ANVITE)#1031962
- Effect of remote monitoring on clinical outcomes in European heart failure patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: secondary results of the REMOTE-CIED randomized trial#364048
- Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation Following Noncardiac Thoracic Surgery#862109
- Shockless Implant Evaluation#804510
Record · ID 848153
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive