ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Coronally Advanced Flap With Two Different Techniques for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
This study compared the clinical outcomes of coronally advanced flap using two different surgical strategies in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Coronally Advanced Flap With Alloderm Versus Coronally Advanced Flap With Micro-needling on RT1 Gingival Recession#1046185
- Clinical, Patient-centered Outcomes and Laser Doppler Flowmetry Using Two Types of SCTG#1172751
- Tunnel With and Without Intramucosal Vertical Incisions#969993
- MIST Versus M-MIST for the Treatment of Intrabony Defects#863401
- To Compare Two Commonly Used Soft Tissue Grafting Techniques to Achieve Coronal Flap Advancement and Root Coverage#906318
Record · ID 848353
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive