ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Holter Versus Zio Patch Electrocardiographic Monitoring in Children
This prospective study aims to compare the diagnostic yield, or ability to detect an arrhythmia, of the traditional Holter monitor versus the novel Zio patch monitor in pediatric patients referred for ambulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring. Children will wear both devices simultaneously for 48 hours and the incidence of clinically significant arrhythmias will be compared.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Holter Monitoring of Critically-ill Childern in PICU at Sohag University Hospital#1170874
- Hemodynamic Monitoring of Newborn Infants With Impedance Cardiography Versus Echocardiography; a Validation Study#827051
- Caretaker in the Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit (CVICU)#1128319
- Respiratory Rate Validation Study#830199
- A Study to Determine the Feasibility of Wireless Electrocardiography#1057570
Record · ID 848535
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive