PhilArchive
open access
Collective Scientific Testimony and Trustworthy Public Health Agencies
How should we evaluate the trustworthiness of public health agencies (PHAs) such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA)? This paper shall answer this question by arguing that PHAs testify as a collective and that conditions of trustworthiness must be evaluated at the collective level. The evaluative criteria consist of scientific competence, justified moral and political considerations and proper institutional design.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- How can we assess whether to trust collectives of scientists?#733621
- Algorithmic Decision-Making, Agency Costs, and Institution-Based Trust#106613
- Seychelles delegation explores collaboration with CMFRI Press Trust of India dated 27th August 2026#664437
- Socially responsible science: Exploring the complexities#81498
- Privacy Foundations for Multi-Institutional Scientific Artificial Intelligence#1144954
Record · ID 84876
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive