_Contemporary Issues in Global Governance_

This paper proposes a foundational rethinking of contemporary global governance through a liminal and non-legal axiomatic framework. It argues that every international transborder limitation of nation-states derives from the principle of no-ius-lex operating within the liminality-of-the-law — understood as the international non-legality space in which the nation-state retains legitimate capacity for action and/or international recognition. Global governance emerges as a necessary structure to recognize and mediate state agency at the global level, conditioned by the essence of this non-legal principle. The Organization (international institution) is created as the logical-linear organ of interstate liminal-international recognition, serving as mediator of non-legality according to the no-ius-lex principle. Legitimacy and recognition at the international level are thus mediated and sublated into the Organization’s space. The paper defines no-ius-lex as the metaphysical condition of maximal possibility that precedes any legal imposition, enabling states to act beyond positive law while remaining compatible with international order. The work concludes that global governance is not a fixed legal superstructure but a contingent mediation of liminal non-legality, whose foundational axioms reveal the irreducible non-legal ground of all international relationality.